Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. Blagge
This text of 12 S.W. 616 (Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. Blagge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action of trespass to try title. Plaintiffs’ chain of title was set out in their petition. One link in the chain is a deed from Stephen H. Everitt to Jonas Butler, charged in the petition to have been executed and delivered on March 1, 1842.
On the trial it was shown-that this deed had been destroyed. Parol evidence sufficient to establish its execution and contents was introduced.
The witnesses by whom this proof was made stated their belief to be that the last deed was dated in 1845. This evidence was objected to by defendant on the ground of variance between the proof and allegation.
The objection was overruled and the evidence admitted:
This ruling of the court.is assigned as error.
We do not think that in this case the date of the last deed was material, and it not being, the.evidence, was properly admitted. ■
The judgment is sufficiently supported by the evidence and is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Delivered February 12, 1889.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 S.W. 616, 73 Tex. 24, 1889 Tex. LEXIS 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houston-east-west-texas-railway-co-v-blagge-tex-1889.