Houston ANUSA, LLC D/B/A AutoNation USA Houston v. Walter Shattenkirk

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 9, 2021·No. 14-20-00446-CV·Published

Opinion

Motion granted and Order filed November 9, 2021

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-20-00446-CV ____________

HOUSTON ANUSA, LLC D/B/A AUTONATION USA HOUSTON, Appellant

V.

WALTER SHATTENKIRK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020-27755

ORDER

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to compel arbitration. Presently before the court is appellant’s motion to stay proceedings in the trial court pending resolution of this appeal, particularly the trial of the case currently scheduled for December 6, 2021.

As the court is mindful that a trial would waste the parties’ and the trial court’s resources if this court ultimately requires arbitration of appellees’ claims, see In re Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 127 (Tex. 2004), the court hereby grants the motion. All proceedings in the trial court are hereby stayed pending issuance of the mandate in this appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Houston ANUSA, LLC D/B/A AutoNation USA Houston v. Walter Shattenkirk, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Houston ANUSA, LLC D/B/A AutoNation USA Houston v. Walter Shattenkirk (Houston ANUSA, LLC D/B/A AutoNation USA Houston v. Walter Shattenkirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)