Housman v. Deegan
This text of 258 A.D. 1032 (Housman v. Deegan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party, on the authority of Matter of Scahill v. Drzewucki (269 N. Y. 343); Wood v. City of New York (274 id. 155, 159); Palmer v. Board of Education (276 id. 222); Matter of Gainey v. Village of Depew (257 App.. Div. 918); Matter of Newell v. City of Buffalo (261 N. Y. 369, 375.) All concur., (The order denies petitioner’s application for a mandamus order to reinstate petitioner’s salary at $165 per month, to which he claims to be entitled as an honorably discharged World war veteran and exempt volunteer fireman.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 1032, 17 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/housman-v-deegan-nyappdiv-1940.