Housley v. Cerise

572 So. 2d 80, 1991 La. LEXIS 157, 1991 WL 1756
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Housley v. Cerise. Read the opinion of the Court — 579 So. 2d 973
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 11, 1991·No. Nos. 90-C-2304, 90-C-2324·Published

Opinion

In re Cerise, Elmo Dr. et al; Cerise, Elmo Mrs.; Cerise, E. John; Aetna Casualty & Suty. Co.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CA-2140; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “A”, No. 83-9254.

Prior report: La.App., 568 So.2d 571.

Granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Housley v. Cerise, 572 So. 2d 80, 1991 La. LEXIS 157, 1991 WL 1756 (La. 1991).

572 So. 2d 80 (Housley v. Cerise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Housley v. Cerise
568 So. 2d 571 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1990)