Housing Opportunities Made Equal, Inc. v. Pataki

New York Supreme Court

Housing Opportunities Made Equal, Inc. v. Pataki

180 Misc. 2d 781, 695 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 295

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJune 16, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 Misc. 2d 781 (Housing Opportunities Made Equal, Inc. v. Pataki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Housing Opportunities Made Equal, Inc. v. Pataki, 180 Misc. 2d 781, 695 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 295 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jacqueline M. Koshian, J.

By memorandum decision of February 23, 1998 this court determined that plaintiffs had a protected property interest in the prompt prosecution of the complaints filed with the Division of Human Rights (Division) and that plaintiffs had been denied due process by the Division’s failure to render a timely determination of them. The order entered therein directed that the Division “immediately schedule a hearing in the Meiselman matter and issue a decision on such complaint forthwith”. [782]*782The Division’s failure to comply with the order and the uncontroverted state of the record made upon plaintiffs’ instant motion for summary judgment warrants a finding that the instant application be granted without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jacqueline M. Koshian, J.

By memorandum decision of February 23, 1998 this court determined that plaintiffs had a protected property interest in the prompt prosecution of the complaints filed with the Division of Human Rights (Division) and that plaintiffs had been denied due process by the Division’s failure to render a timely determination of them. The order entered therein directed that the Division “immediately schedule a hearing in the Meiselman matter and issue a decision on such complaint forthwith”. [782]*782The Division’s failure to comply with the order and the uncontroverted state of the record made upon plaintiffs’ instant motion for summary judgment warrants a finding that the instant application be granted without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 Misc. 2d 781, 695 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/housing-opportunities-made-equal-inc-v-pataki-nysupct-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack