Housing Authority v. New

136 S.E.2d 732, 220 Ga. 1, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 428
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 7, 1964
Docket22354
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 136 S.E.2d 732 (Housing Authority v. New) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Housing Authority v. New, 136 S.E.2d 732, 220 Ga. 1, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 428 (Ga. 1964).

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The single question presented to this court by the petition for certiorari for our decision is whether the pre-trial stipulation and order that the value of the property be fixed as of December 1, 1958, was correctly construed by the Court of Appeals to mean that interest on the amount the jury found in excess of the amount paid into the registry of the court on June 26, 1961, should be computed from December 1, 1958. We are required only to decide if the Court of Appeals correctly construed the pre-trial order. On its face and beyond doubt, it related to and was intended only to relate to the date on which value would be fixed. It does not refer to the time of taking which was a matter already fixed by paying the amount of the award on June 26, 1961. The condemnor did not owe any part of the value of the property until it took the same on June 26, 1961, and, of course, no interest could lawfully be charged thereon before payment was due. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court judgment which allowed interest from the time of taking. See Code §§ 57-110, 57-111; Central Ga. Power Co. v. Stone, 142 Ga. 662 (83 SE 524); Gate City Terminal Co. v. Thrower, 136 Ga. 456 (71 SE 903); Atlantic &c. R. Co. v. Penny, 119 Ga. 479 (46 SE 665); Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. [2]*2Postal Tel. Co., 120 Ga. 268 (48 SE 15, 1 AC 734); State Hwy. Board v. Warthen, 54 Ga. App. 759 (189 SE 76).

Argued April 14, 1964 Decided May 7, 1964. King & Spalding, R. Byron Attridge, Charles H. Kirbo, for plaintiff in error. Schwall & Heuett, contra.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Venable v. Lee
233 S.E.2d 3 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
New v. Housing Authority of Atlanta
137 S.E.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S.E.2d 732, 220 Ga. 1, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/housing-authority-v-new-ga-1964.