Housing Authority of Baltimore City v. White

667 F. App'x 397
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 25, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1211
StatusPublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 397 (Housing Authority of Baltimore City v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Housing Authority of Baltimore City v. White, 667 F. App'x 397 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Erica S. White appeals the district court’s orders remanding this removed action to state court for lack of jurisdiction and denying the motion for reconsideration. An order remanding a case to state court is generally not reviewable on appeal or otherwise. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012). The Supreme Court has limited the scope of § 1447(d), prohibiting appellate review of remand orders based on a defect in the removal procedure or lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706, 711-12, 116 S.Ct. 1712, 135 L.Ed.2d 1 (1996); see 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2012). Here, remand was based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quackenbush v. Allstate Insurance
517 U.S. 706 (Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/housing-authority-of-baltimore-city-v-white-ca4-2016.