Housing Auth., City of Trenton v. Green

289 A.2d 264, 118 N.J. Super. 544, 1972 N.J. Super. LEXIS 581
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedMarch 30, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 289 A.2d 264 (Housing Auth., City of Trenton v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Housing Auth., City of Trenton v. Green, 289 A.2d 264, 118 N.J. Super. 544, 1972 N.J. Super. LEXIS 581 (N.J. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

118 N.J. Super. 544 (1972)
289 A.2d 264

HOUSING AUTHORITY, CITY OF TRENTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MATTIE GREEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 28, 1972.
Decided March 30, 1972.

*545 Before Judges CONFORD, MATTHEWS and FRITZ.

Mr. Laurence I. Tomar argued the cause for appellant (Mrs. Alice Ashley Costello, Director Legal Aid Society of Mercer County, attorney).

Mr. Mark D. Kaplan, Jules J. Kelsey argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The parties concede the $15 attorney's fee to be reasonable as a general matter. It was therefore properly contracted for. See Bergen Builders, Inc. v. Horizon Developers, Inc., 44 N.J. 435 (1965).

The fee could lawfully be contracted to be considered additional rent, for purposes of the summary dispossess act. See Vineland Shopping Center, Inc. v. De Marco, 35 N.J. 459, 470 (1961).

We find nothing in the federal or state statutes or applicable regulations involving low-rent housing policies which is contravened by the lease provision here challenged. It is entirely consistent with those policies that landlord housing authorities recoup from dilatory tenants the reasonable *546 legal costs attendant upon necessary dispossess actions. Nor is there anything unconscionable or otherwise contrary to public policy in doing so by a lease stipulation that the reasonable attorney's fees become additional rent due and owing by the tenant.

Other arguments advanced by defendant are found to lack merit.

Affirmed; no costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency v. Taylor
796 A.2d 193 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)
Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency v. Taylor
760 A.2d 362 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2000)
Community Realty Management, Inc. v. Harris
714 A.2d 282 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1998)
Fargo Realty, Inc. v. Harris
414 A.2d 256 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1980)
University Court v. Mahasin
400 A.2d 133 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Center Grove Associates v. Hoerr
370 A.2d 55 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 A.2d 264, 118 N.J. Super. 544, 1972 N.J. Super. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/housing-auth-city-of-trenton-v-green-njsuperctappdiv-1972.