Houseworth v. Suydam
7 Cow. 106
This text of 7 Cow. 106 (Houseworth v. Suydam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Houseworth v. Suydam, 7 Cow. 106 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
Opinion
We require the return and affidavit, or copies, to be produced on the argument; to the end that we may determine, by comparing them, how far the amendments sought for by the motion are necessary. But we have not required that they should be served.
The return and a copy of the affidavit being produced, the court received them; and considered the motion on its merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 Cow. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houseworth-v-suydam-nysupct-1827.