Houser v. State

1912 OK CR 405, 127 P. 706, 8 Okla. Crim. 292, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 18, 1912
DocketNo. A-1493.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1912 OK CR 405 (Houser v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Houser v. State, 1912 OK CR 405, 127 P. 706, 8 Okla. Crim. 292, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

FURMAN, P. J.

It appears ’from the record that the judgment in this case was rendered against the appellant in the county court of Blaine county on the 26th day of July, 1911, *293 from which appellant appealed. But the appeal was not perfected by filing the transcript of the record in this court until the 25th day of November, 1911.

On the 27th day of September, 1911, the county court of Blaine county entered an order granting 4 months from date of judgment in which the appellant might prepare and file his case-made in this court. This order is without warrant or authority of law. Section 6948, Comp. Laws 1909, regulates this matter as follows:

“In misdemeanor cases the appeal must be taken within sixty days after the judgment is rendered: Provided, however, that the trial court or judge may, for good cause shown, extend the time in which said appeal may be taken not exceeding sixty days.”

The time in which an appeal must be perfected in misdemeanor cases is regulated by the statute by days, and not by months. In this particular .case 122 days had elapsed after the rendition of judgment before the appeal was perfected. As the 120 days had elapsed in which this should have been done, this court failed to acquire jurisdiction of this cause, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed. If an appellant can perfect his appeal 2 days after the time has expired, he might take 2 months or 2 years afterwards to perfect the appeal. The time for perfecting an appeal is a limitation on the right.

DOYLE, J., concurs; ARMSTRONG, J., absent, and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Krivanek v. State
1914 OK CR 140 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1912 OK CR 405, 127 P. 706, 8 Okla. Crim. 292, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houser-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.