Houser v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Houser v. State

449 S.W.3d 819, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2014 WL 6779535

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 2, 2014·No. No. ED 100736·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Carl A. Houser, Jr., (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for pos1>-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to present mental competency evidence at his suppression hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Carl A. Houser, Jr., (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for pos1>-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to present mental competency evidence at his suppression hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Houser v. State, 449 S.W.3d 819, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2014 WL 6779535 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

449 S.W.3d 819 (Houser v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.