Houser v. Dranchuk

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

LESLIE HOUSER, “Abe”; RODNEY JEFFERY; ROBERT ROBINSON; GUSTAVO HURTADO; and BRADLEY CANTRELL PLAINTIFFS

V. No. 4:23-cv-444-DPM

IGOR DRANCHUK; CAPITOL TRUCKING, INC.; ACCORD TRUCKING, INC; and JOHN DOES 1-10 DEFENDANTS

ORDER 1. Joint stipulation of dismissal, Doc. 31, noted. The parties have settled Houser’s, Jeffery’s, Robinson’s, and Hurtado’s claims. Congratulations. Those claims will be dismissed with prejudice; but the Court will retain jurisdiction for a time to enforce the settlement. 2. The remaining plaintiff, Bradley Cantrell, is pro se. In an earlier Order, the Court directed him to respond to the defendants’ written discovery by 9 July 2024. Doc. 28. And, at the Court's direction, his former attorney sent him a copy of that Order. Doc. 29. Cantrell has not responded to the discovery requests. Nor has he requested more time to do so. The embedded Rule 41(b) motion, Doc. 31 at 1, is therefore granted. Cantrell’s claims will be dismissed without

prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); First General Resources Co. v. Elton Leather Corp., 958 F.2d 204, 206 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). So Ordered. OPrvrnst wl LE Vv D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge aG Asst avait

=.