Houser & Houser v. Lithgow Manufacturing Co.
84 Ga. 333
Opinion
The plaintiffs in error allege that the court below committed error in its instructions to the jury. We have looked at the charge, and while we do not think the judge below committed any error therein, yet if he had, it would not work a reversal of this case, inasmuch as the verdict was demanded by the evidence and was right under the law and the facts of the case.
Judgment affi.rm.ed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Houser & Houser v. Lithgow Manufacturing Co., 84 Ga. 333 (Ga. 1890).
84 Ga. 333 (Houser & Houser v. Lithgow Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
International Harvester Co. of America v. Adams
68 S.E. 1093 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)