Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 31, 2016·No. 21 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

DARIEN HOUSER, : No. 21 EM 2016 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, RAMSEY, S. : WILLIAMS, YOUNG, KRALLE, : GROSSMAN, CAMERON, BURKE, : GLICA, HARRIS, CADDEN, CRUZ, : JANE/JOHN DOE, ET AL, SUED IN : INDIVIDUAL & OFFICIAL CAPACITY, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Application for an Immediate Hearing, the Motion to

Compel an Answer, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief

are DENIED,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl, (Pa. 2016).

Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl (Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.