Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl
This text of Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl (Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
DARIEN HOUSER, : No. 21 EM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, RAMSEY, S. : WILLIAMS, YOUNG, KRALLE, : GROSSMAN, CAMERON, BURKE, : GLICA, HARRIS, CADDEN, CRUZ, : JANE/JOHN DOE, ET AL, SUED IN : INDIVIDUAL & OFFICIAL CAPACITY, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the Application for an Immediate Hearing, the Motion to
Compel an Answer, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief
are DENIED,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houser-d-v-cty-of-phl-pa-2016.