Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
DARIEN HOUSER, : No. 21 EM 2016 :
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, RAMSEY, S. : WILLIAMS, YOUNG, KRALLE, : GROSSMAN, CAMERON, BURKE, : GLICA, HARRIS, CADDEN, CRUZ, : JANE/JOHN DOE, ET AL, SUED IN : INDIVIDUAL & OFFICIAL CAPACITY, :
:
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the Application for an Immediate Hearing, the Motion to
Compel an Answer, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief
are DENIED,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl (Houser, D. v. Cty of Phl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.