Houseman v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Houseman v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.

154 N.Y.S. 1126, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9351

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 154 N.Y.S. 1126 (Houseman v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houseman v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., 154 N.Y.S. 1126, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by George A. Houseman against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.. No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. Held that the moving papers do not show the necessity for an open commission, nor were adequate terms imposed. See, also, Sullivan v. Taintor Mfg. Co., 144 App. Div. 797, 129 N. Y. Supp. 598, and cases there cited. See, also, 154 N. Y. Supp. 1126.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by George A. Houseman against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.. No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. Held that the moving papers do not show the necessity for an open commission, nor were adequate terms imposed. See, also, Sullivan v. Taintor Mfg. Co., 144 App. Div. 797, 129 N. Y. Supp. 598, and cases there cited. See, also, 154 N. Y. Supp. 1126.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 N.Y.S. 1126, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houseman-v-new-york-cent-h-r-r-co-nyappdiv-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack