Houseman v. Grossman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Houseman v. Grossman

35 A. 736, 177 Pa. 453, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1006

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 5, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 43

StatusPublished

Cited by20 cases

This text of 35 A. 736 (Houseman v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houseman v. Grossman, 35 A. 736, 177 Pa. 453, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1006 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Cheep Justice Sterrett,

We find nothing in this record that requires either a reversal or modification of the decree, except as hereafter mentioned.

The questions involved, as far as they are material, have been fully considered and correctly decided by the learned judge who presided at the hearing. There appears to be nothing in either of them that requires further discussion. The period of sixty days, named in the decree, has expired, and the time should be so extended as to commence and take effect from the filing of this opinion.

With this modification, as to extension of the time within which the defendants may pay, etc., the decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president of the 45th judicial district, and the appeal is dismissed at the defendants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI