Houseman v. Bodine

New York Supreme Court

Houseman v. Bodine

14 N.Y. St. Rep. 932

DecidedFebruary 13, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 14 N.Y. St. Rep. 932 (Houseman v. Bodine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houseman v. Bodine, 14 N.Y. St. Rep. 932 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Pratt, J.

It is entirely clear that the covenant was executed by defendant with the intent to make the bond and mortgage valid securities in the hands of the plaintiff.

We think he succeeded in the effort, and that he is estopped from any defense.

The bond and mortgage were assigned in pursuance of the agreement of defendant who.cannot expect the court to relieve him from the consequences of his act.

All the circumstances corroborate the plaintiff, and the judgment of the special term should be affirmed, with costs.

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pratt, J.

It is entirely clear that the covenant was executed by defendant with the intent to make the bond and mortgage valid securities in the hands of the plaintiff.

We think he succeeded in the effort, and that he is estopped from any defense.

The bond and mortgage were assigned in pursuance of the agreement of defendant who.cannot expect the court to relieve him from the consequences of his act.

All the circumstances corroborate the plaintiff, and the judgment of the special term should be affirmed, with costs.

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 N.Y. St. Rep. 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houseman-v-bodine-nysupct-1888.