Housel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

164 A.D. 964

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: October 15, 1914
• Status: Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff made out a prima facie ease under the Federal Safety Appliance Act and the Federal Employers’ Liability Aet.

† Kate M. 0’Neill, Respondent, v. John A. Dicks, Appellant.—Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.

See 37 U. S. Stat. at Large, 531, chap. 196; 29 id. 85, chap. 87; 32 id. 943, chap. 976; 35 id. 470, chap. 225; 36 id. 298, chap. 160; 36 id. 913, chap. 103; 35 id. 65, chap. 149, asamd. by 36 id. 291, chap. 143.—[Rep.