Household Finance Realty Corp. v. Wilcock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Household Finance Realty Corp. v. Wilcock

212 A.D.2d 759, 624 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.D.2d 759 (Household Finance Realty Corp. v. Wilcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Household Finance Realty Corp. v. Wilcock, 212 A.D.2d 759, 624 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered March 2, 1993, which, inter alia, denied their motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale entered March 10, 1992, upon their default.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion to set aside their default (see, Beila Assocs. v 27-29 W. 181 St. Assocs., 205 AD2d 320).

We have reviewed the defendants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered March 2, 1993, which, inter alia, denied their motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale entered March 10, 1992, upon their default.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion to set aside their default (see, Beila Assocs. v 27-29 W. 181 St. Assocs., 205 AD2d 320).

We have reviewed the defendants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 759, 624 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/household-finance-realty-corp-v-wilcock-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack