Household Finance Realty Corp. v. Robinson

68 A.D.3d 1724, 890 N.Y.2d 846
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: We affirm the judgment insofar as it granted plaintiffs motion to dismiss the counterclaims for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court dated July 14, 2008. We also affirm the judgment insofar as it granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as a sanction pursuant to CPLR 3126. Defendant met his initial burden by establishing that plaintiff engaged in willful, contumacious or bad faith conduct by failing to comply with a court order concerning outstanding discovery demands, thereby shifting the burden to plaintiff to offer a reasonable excuse for its noncompliance, and plaintiff failed to meet that burden (see Hill v Oberoi, 13 AD3d 1095 [2004]). Present — Hurlbutt, J.E, Peradotto, Garni, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Household Finance Realty Corp. v. Robinson, 68 A.D.3d 1724, 890 N.Y.2d 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 1724 (Household Finance Realty Corp. v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SARACH, STEPHEN v. M&T BANK CORPORATION
140 A.D.3d 1721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)