House v. State

94 S.W.2d 1158, 130 Tex. Crim. 520, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 1, 1936·No. No. 18039.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft of property over the value of fifty dollars; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

It is not made to appear that the statement of facts was filed in the trial court. This court is not authorized to consider a statement of facts which fails to show that it has been filed in the trial court. Rogers v. State, 69 S. W. (2d) 769.

In the absence of a statement of facts we are unable to appraise the bills of exception found in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Morrow, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

House v. State, 94 S.W.2d 1158, 130 Tex. Crim. 520, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316 (Tex. 1936).

94 S.W.2d 1158 (House v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeRamus v. State
396 S.W.2d 383 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Taylor v. State
150 S.W.2d 393 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1941)