House v. State
This text of 94 S.W.2d 1158 (House v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The offense is theft of property over the value of fifty dollars; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.
It is not made to appear that the statement of facts was filed in the trial court. This court is not authorized to consider a statement of facts which fails to show that it has been filed in the trial court. Rogers v. State, 69 S. W. (2d) 769.
In the absence of a statement of facts we are unable to appraise the bills of exception found in the record.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Morrow, P. J., absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.W.2d 1158, 130 Tex. Crim. 520, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/house-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.