House v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

House v. State

731 S.W.2d 372, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 3958

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 1987·No. No. 52122·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion challenged his two concurrent sentences of eight years after having pled guilty to two charges of forgery: uttering as genuine.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not clearly erroneous. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion challenged his two concurrent sentences of eight years after having pled guilty to two charges of forgery: uttering as genuine.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not clearly erroneous. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

House v. State, 731 S.W.2d 372, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 3958 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

731 S.W.2d 372 (House v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.