House v. State

135 S.E. 448, 36 Ga. App. 99, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 791
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 9, 1926·No. 17551·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the ruling in Taylor v. State, 25 Ga. App. 500 (1, 2) (103 S. E. 740), and the facts of the instant ease, the verdict was authorized by the evidence.

2. All the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are based upon alleged errors in the charge of the court. However, when the excerpts from the charge complained of are considered in the light of the facts of the case and the charge as a whole, no material or harmful error appears.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

House v. State, 135 S.E. 448, 36 Ga. App. 99, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 791 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

135 S.E. 448 (House v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
103 S.E. 740 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)