House v. State

135 S.E. 448, 36 Ga. App. 99, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 791
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1926
Docket17551
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 448 (House v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
House v. State, 135 S.E. 448, 36 Ga. App. 99, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 791 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the ruling in Taylor v. State, 25 Ga. App. 500 (1, 2) (103 S. E. 740), and the facts of the instant ease, the verdict was authorized by the evidence.

2. All the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are based upon alleged errors in the charge of the court. However, when the excerpts from the charge complained of are considered in the light of the facts of the case and the charge as a whole, no material or harmful error appears.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. State
103 S.E. 740 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 448, 36 Ga. App. 99, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/house-v-state-gactapp-1926.