House v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

House v. State

651 So. 2d 1229, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2052, 1995 WL 85273

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in House v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 696 So. 2d 515 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 1995·No. No. 93-00778·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

King Solomon House appeals his judgment and sentence entered following his no contest plea to various drug-related offenses, specifically arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because police officers lacked a founded suspicion to stop House and lacked probable cause to arrest him. The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress. We, therefore, affirm the judgment and sentence but strike the costs the trial court imposed for the Court Improvement Fund. See Reyes v. State, No. 92-03336, — So.2d - [1995 WL 65502] (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 15, 1995).

RYDER, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

King Solomon House appeals his judgment and sentence entered following his no contest plea to various drug-related offenses, specifically arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because police officers lacked a founded suspicion to stop House and lacked probable cause to arrest him. The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress. We, therefore, affirm the judgment and sentence but strike the costs the trial court imposed for the Court Improvement Fund. See Reyes v. State, No. 92-03336, — So.2d - [1995 WL 65502] (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 15, 1995).

RYDER, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

House v. State, 651 So. 2d 1229, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2052, 1995 WL 85273 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

651 So. 2d 1229 (House v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related