House v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

House v. State

168 So. 3, 124 Fla. 226, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1089

DecidedMay 2, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 3 (House v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

House v. State, 168 So. 3, 124 Fla. 226, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1089 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application by Albert R. House for supersedeas of a judgment and sentence entered against him by the Criminal Court of Record of Hillsborough County pursuant to the proceedings heretofore had in this Court remanding said House to be therein resentenced. See: State, ex rel. House, v. Mayo, decided December 14, 1935, 122 Fla. 23, 164 Sou. Rep. 673.

Our conclusion is that supersedeas in a situation of this kind is not a matter of right and that no circumstance has been made to appear sufficient to impel this Court to award a supersedeas as a matter within its discretion.

Supersedeas denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI