House v. Slow Food, LLC

2026 NY Slip Op 30103(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedJanuary 12, 2026
DocketIndex No. 159450/2018
StatusUnpublished
AuthorArlene P. Bluth

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 30103(U) (House v. Slow Food, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
House v. Slow Food, LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 30103(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

House v Slow Food, LLC 2026 NY Slip Op 30103(U) January 12, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159450/2018 Judge: Arlene P. Bluth Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/2026 10:36 AM INDEX NO. 159450/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 239 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2026

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. ARLENE P. BLUTH PART 14 Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 159450/2018 ERIN-LOUISE HOUSE, RASHMI PANDEY, MOTION DATE 12/22/2025 Plaintiffs, MOTION SEQ. NO. 010 011 -v- SLOW FOOD, LLC,JOHN MANOS, VASILY THEODORIDIS DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 010) 218, 219, 220, 221, 223, 224, 225, 226, 231, 232, 235 were read on this motion to/for MODIFY ORDER/JUDGMENT .

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 011) 227, 228, 229, 233, 234, 236 were read on this motion to/for ALTERNATE SERVICE .

Defendant Manon’s motion (MS010) to reargue/renew the portion of the Court’s decision

conditioning the vacatur of his default on posting a bond is denied and plaintiff’s cross-motion to

reinstate the default is granted. Plaintiff’s motion (MS011) for the approval of an ex parte order

is granted.

Background

This action concerns plaintiffs’ work for defendants and their claims that defendants

violated the New York Labor Law by inter alia failing to pay proper wages and failing to pay for

overtime work. The judge previously assigned to this matter referred the issue of damages to a

special referee (after defendants’ attorney had withdrawn as counsel and defendants defaulted)

and the referee awarded damages to plaintiffs in a decision from September 2021 (NYSCEF 159450/2018 HOUSE, ERIN-LOUISE vs. SLOW FOOD LLC Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 010 011

1 of 6 [* 1] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/2026 10:36 AM INDEX NO. 159450/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 239 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2026

Doc. No. 146). Eventually, plaintiffs obtained a judgment against Slow Food, LLC and John

Manos (the case settled with defendant Theodoridis) in September 2023 (NYSCEF Doc. No.

173).

MS010

Defendant Manos then moved to vacate his default and the judge previously assigned to

the matter (who has since retired) granted that motion, conditioned on defendant Manos filing an

undertaking for the judgments entered against him (NYSCEF Doc. No. 212).

In motion sequence 010, defendant Manos wants to remove the requirement that he post

an undertaking. As an initial matter, the Court denies the motion because it did not properly

differentiate between a motion to reargue and renew as required by CPLR 2221[f]). Manos

simply lumped these two together. To the extent the motion is one to reargue the now-retired

prior judge’s decision, the motion is denied.

Assuming that it is a motion to renew, Manos contends that he has been unable to secure

an undertaking in his affirmation (NYSCEF Doc. No. 220). He claims this is because he is a

resident of Australia and that he does not have the funds to post a bond for the full amount.

These purported justifications are not a basis to modify the prior order. Defendant Manos did

not attach any proof of these conversations with the potential bond/surety companies despite

suggesting he emailed them. Plus, he did not submit any proof to substantiate his claim that he

lacks the sufficient funds.

The fact is that the prior judge was entitled to condition the vacatur on the posting of a

bond pursuant to CPLR 5015 as long as the “circumstances which justified the additional

security” are reasonable (see Czub v Russell, 177 AD2d 831, 831, 576 NYS2d 445 [3d Dept

1991]). Here, the prior judge required the undertaking on the ground that defendant Manos did

159450/2018 HOUSE, ERIN-LOUISE vs. SLOW FOOD LLC Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 010 011

2 of 6 [* 2] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/2026 10:36 AM INDEX NO. 159450/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 239 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2026

not keep his former counsel apprised of his whereabouts and this Court declines to modify that

decision.

Therefore, because Manos has not posted the required bond, the Court grants plaintiffs’

motion to reinstate the default judgment.

MS011

This is an ex parte order in which plaintiffs seek to serve a sheriff’s notice with property

execution and lienor notification letter on Mr. Manos and defendant Slow Food. Defendant

Manos claims that he has not had ties with Slow Food since 2019 and that he should not be

treated as one and the same for purposes of a default judgment.

Plaintiffs point out that the sheriff is required under CPLR 5232 to serve a copy of the

execution on the garnishee. And they stress that Manos has repeatedly emphasized that he is an

Australian national living in Australia and his only connection to the United States is that his

attorneys are in New York state.

Based on this record, the Court approves the proposed order attached to the motion. The

fact is that the judgment was entered against Slow Food LLC and Manos jointly and severally

(NYSCEF Doc. No. 173). So there is good reason to permit the sheriff to serve in the way

proposed by plaintiffs.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that defendant Manos’ motion (MS010) to reargue/renew is denied; and it is

further

ORDERED that plaintiff’s cross-motion to reinstate the default judgment is granted; and

it is further

159450/2018 HOUSE, ERIN-LOUISE vs. SLOW FOOD LLC Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 010 011

3 of 6 [* 3] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/2026 10:36 AM INDEX NO. 159450/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 239 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2026

ORDERED that Court approves plaintiff’s proposed ex parte order (MS011) as attached.

1/12/2026 $SIG$ DATE ARLENE P. BLUTH, J.S.C. CHECK ONE: X CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

□ GRANTED DENIED GRANTED IN PART X OTHER

APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER

□ CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE

159450/2018 HOUSE, ERIN-LOUISE vs. SLOW FOOD LLC Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 010 011

4 of 6 [* 4] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/2026 10:36 AM INDEX NO. 159450/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 239 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2026

At an IAS Part ___, 14 of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of New York, at the courthouse thereof located at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York 10007, on the ___12 day of ________________ January 2025 6

PRESENT: HON _______________________ Arlene P. Bluth J.S.C.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X ERIN-LOUISE HOUSE and RASHMI PANDEY Index No. 159450/2018

Plaintiff EX-PARTE ORDER

-against-

SLOW FOOD LLC d/b/a MARKET LANE NYC, JOHN MANOS and VASILI THEODORIDIS

Defendants ---------------------------------------------------------------X

Plaintiffs Erin-Louise House and Rashmi Pandey, having duly moved for an Ex-Parte order

pursuant to CPLR §§ 311-a(b) and 5232 directing the manner in which a Sheriff’s Notice with

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Czub v. Russell
177 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 30103(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/house-v-slow-food-llc-nysupctnewyork-2026.