House v. Mayo

Fifth Circuit

House v. Mayo

151 F.2d 1014, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3068

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 1945

DocketNo. 11396

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 F.2d 1014 (House v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

House v. Mayo, 151 F.2d 1014, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3068 (5th Cir. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district judge, in an opinion 63 F. Supp. 169, carefully setting out the applicable principles of law and as carefully reviewing the facts, has found that the petitioner did not make out a case for release on habeas corpus from confinement in the state penitentiary. Upon a careful examination of the record, we are convinced that his findings are well supported and that the judgment should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The district judge, in an opinion 63 F. Supp. 169, carefully setting out the applicable principles of law and as carefully reviewing the facts, has found that the petitioner did not make out a case for release on habeas corpus from confinement in the state penitentiary. Upon a careful examination of the record, we are convinced that his findings are well supported and that the judgment should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 F.2d 1014, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/house-v-mayo-ca5-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack