House v. Berkman, Henoch, Peterson & Peddy, P.C.

Second Circuit

House v. Berkman, Henoch, Peterson & Peddy, P.C.

56 F. App'x 32

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 2003

DocketDocket No. 02-7530

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 F. App'x 32 (House v. Berkman, Henoch, Peterson & Peddy, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

House v. Berkman, Henoch, Peterson & Peddy, P.C., 56 F. App'x 32 (2d Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

[33]*33Juanita House appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Scott, M.J.), which granted defendant Berkman, Henoch, Peterson & Peddy, P.C.’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissed House’s claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., the New York State Debt Collection Procedures Act, the New York State Deceptive Acts and Practices Act, and state law defamation claim.

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. See Juanita House v. Berkman, Henoch, Peterson & Peddy, P.C., and Bank United, 00-CV-0059 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2002).

For the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI