House v. ASSOCIATES IN WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE, LLC

258 S.W.3d 469, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 756, 2008 WL 2246940
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 3, 2008·No. ED 89994·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sally and Richard House (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Associates in Women’s Healthcare, LLC and Mary Grimm, M.D. on their claims of negligence resulting from an injury Sally sustained during medical treatment. We find that the trial court did not err in refusing to permit Plaintiffs to submit the issue of comparative fault to the jury at the conclusion of trial.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

House v. ASSOCIATES IN WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE, LLC, 258 S.W.3d 469, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 756, 2008 WL 2246940 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

258 S.W.3d 469 (House v. ASSOCIATES IN WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbia Mutual Insurance Co. v. Long
258 S.W.3d 469 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)