House v. ASSOCIATES IN WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE, LLC
This text of 258 S.W.3d 469 (House v. ASSOCIATES IN WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Sally and Richard House (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Associates in Women’s Healthcare, LLC and Mary Grimm, M.D. on their claims of negligence resulting from an injury Sally sustained during medical treatment. We find that the trial court did not err in refusing to permit Plaintiffs to submit the issue of comparative fault to the jury at the conclusion of trial.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 S.W.3d 469, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 756, 2008 WL 2246940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/house-v-associates-in-womens-healthcare-llc-moctapp-2008.