Hourtienne v. Schnoor
This text of 33 Mich. 274 (Hourtienne v. Schnoor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Complainant filed her bill to avoid a mortgage made on the homestead of her husband during their family occupation of it, alleging that she never knowingly signed or acknowledged it.
There are some suspicious circumstances about the case, but there is no doubt of the mortgagee’s good faith, nor of the fact that the money was borrowed and used to build a house on the premises. The justice who took the acknowledgment swears quite distinctly upon the facts, and there is corroborating evidence.
All presumptions in cases of this kind must be treated with reasonable respect to the improbability of misconduct in a reputable officer, or of forgery which he ought to have discovered if it existed; and the burden of proof was on complainant to make out a plain case.
We do not think her case is clear enough to warrant us iu disturbing the decree against her below, which is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Mich. 274, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hourtienne-v-schnoor-mich-1876.