Houpt v. Turner

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Houpt v. Turner

55 N.J. Eq. 593

CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery

DecidedMarch 15, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 N.J. Eq. 593 (Houpt v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houpt v. Turner, 55 N.J. Eq. 593 (N.J. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ludlow, J.

On review of this case, the court of errors and appeals are of the opinion that the conclusions and findings of the learned vice-chancellor on which the decree in said case; as advised by him, is made, are not warranted by the evidence and the law. The decree of the court of chancery is reversed, and the bill should be dismissed, with costs.

For reversal — Garrison, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 9.

For affirmance — Dixon, Barkalow — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ludlow, J.

On review of this case, the court of errors and appeals are of the opinion that the conclusions and findings of the learned vice-chancellor on which the decree in said case; as advised by him, is made, are not warranted by the evidence and the law. The decree of the court of chancery is reversed, and the bill should be dismissed, with costs.

For reversal — Garrison, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 9.

For affirmance — Dixon, Barkalow — 2.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 N.J. Eq. 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houpt-v-turner-njch-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack