Houpt v. Turner

55 N.J. Eq. 593
New Jersey Court of Chancery·Decided March 15, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ludlow, J.

On review of this case, the court of errors and appeals are of the opinion that the conclusions and findings of the learned vice-chancellor on which the decree in said case; as advised by him, is made, are not warranted by the evidence and the law. The decree of the court of chancery is reversed, and the bill should be dismissed, with costs.

For reversal — Garrison, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 9.

For affirmance — Dixon, Barkalow — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Houpt v. Turner, 55 N.J. Eq. 593 (N.J. Ct. App. 1897).

55 N.J. Eq. 593 (Houpt v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related