Houmam Kouaici v. Jefferson Sessions

692 F. App'x 326
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 11, 2017
Docket16-3761
StatusUnpublished

This text of 692 F. App'x 326 (Houmam Kouaici v. Jefferson Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Houmam Kouaici v. Jefferson Sessions, 692 F. App'x 326 (8th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Moroccan citizen Houmam Kouaici petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decision of an immigration judge who denied him asylum and withholding of removal. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Kouaici’s asylum application was untimely filed. See Cambara-Cambara v. Lynch, 837 F.3d 822, 825 (8th Cir. 2016). We conclude that substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of withholding of removal on the ground that Kouaici failed to establish that he would be subject to future persecution in Morocco based on a protected ground. See Fesehaye v. Holder, 607 F.3d 523, 526 (8th Cir. 2010). The petition is therefore denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fesehaye v. Holder
607 F.3d 523 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Ruben Cambara-Cambara v. Loretta E. Lynch
837 F.3d 822 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
692 F. App'x 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houmam-kouaici-v-jefferson-sessions-ca8-2017.