Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin, INC. v. B.C.E. West Ltd. Partnership
This text of 121 F. App'x 779 (Houlihan, Lokey, Howard & Zukin, INC. v. B.C.E. West Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion or misapply the law when it reduced the total fee award payable to Appellant Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin, Inc. See Leichty v. Neary (In re Strand), 375 F.3d 854, 857 (9th Cir.2004) (‘We will not disturb a bankruptcy court’s award of [professional] fees unless the bankruptcy court abused its discretion or erroneously applied the law.”) (citations omitted). The court properly considered “the nature, the extent, and the value” of Appellant’s services, taking into account the factors it deemed relevant. See 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(3)(A); see also Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Capital v. Unsecured Creditors’ Liquidating Trust (In re Commercial Fin. Servs., Inc), 298 B.R. 733, 748 (B.A.P. 10th Cir.2003) (“[T]he factors to be taken into account in determining reasonableness are within the discretion of the bankruptcy court____”).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [780]*780courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 F. App'x 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houlihan-lokey-howard-zukin-inc-v-bce-west-ltd-partnership-ca9-2005.