Houlahan v. World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools
This text of Houlahan v. World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools (Houlahan v. World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________________________
THOMAS G. HOULAHAN,
Plaintiff,
v. 1:04-CV-1161 (FJS/AK) WORLD WIDE ASSOCIATION OF SPECIALTY PROGRAMS AND SCHOOLS, a Corporation; FREEMAN WALL AIELLO, a Partnership; KENNETH KAY, an individual; JAMES WALL, an individual; C.S. LANDRE FOUNDATION, a Nonprofit Organization; and LANCE LANDRE, an individual,
Defendants. ___________________________________________________
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
THOMAS G. HOULAHAN Washington, D.C. 20016 Plaintiff pro se
JORDAN, COYNE & SAVITS LLP JOHN TREMAIN MAY, ESQ. 1100 Connecticut Avenue NW PADRAIC K. KEANE, ESQ. Suite 600 Washington, DC 20016 Attorneys for Defendants World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools and Kenneth Kay
HOGAN & HEALD ROGER W. HEALD, ESQ. 11130 Fairfax Boulevard Suite 310 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Attorneys for Defendants Freeman Wall Aiello and James Wall
SCULLIN, Senior Judge ORDER
On December 30, 2011, Plaintiff and Defendants World Wide Association of Specialty
Programs and Schools and Kenneth Kay (collectively "the World Wide Defendants") filed a joint
motion to dismiss, with prejudice, Plaintiffs' claims against the World Wide Defendants pursuant
to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff and the World Wide
Defendants had reached an agreement to resolve all of Plaintiff's claims against the World Wide
Defendants. See Dkt. No. 148. Furthermore, Plaintiff and the World Wide Defendants moved to
have the Court deny as moot all pending motions between Plaintiff and the World Wide
Defendants, including Plaintiff's motion for sanctions, if the Court granted their joint motion to
dismiss Plaintiff's claims against the World Wide Defendants. See id.
After reviewing the entire record in this matter, the parties' submissions, and the
applicable law, the Court hereby
ORDERS that the joint motion of Plaintiff and the World Wide Defendants to dismiss,
with prejudice, all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant World Wide Association of Specialty
Programs and Schools and Defendant Kenneth Kay is GRANTED;1 and the Court further
1 The Court notes that, as a result of the dismissal of Plaintiff's claims against the World Wide Defendants, the only remaining claims in this action are Plaintiff's fourth and fifth causes of action for libel against Defendants James Wall and Freeman Wall Aiello. The Court will contact the parties in the near future to set a date for a status conference to discuss the remaining claims.
-2- ORDERS that all of the pending motions between Plaintiff and Defendant World Wide
Association of Specialty Programs and Schools and Defendant Kenneth Kay are DENIED as
moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 30, 2011 Syracuse, New York
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Houlahan v. World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houlahan-v-world-wide-association-of-specialty-pro-dcd-2011.