Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co.
67 S.W.2d 1112
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 S.W.2d 496 →
Opinion
On motion for rehearing.
In our original opinion [65 S.W.(2d) 496]‘we erroneously stated that this suit was filed October 25, 1929. The record discloses that the suit was filed on March 21, 1930. While this correction in no- way changes the conclusions reached in the former opinion, it is made so that the facts stated will accurately state the facts contained in the record.
Having made the foregoing correction, we recommend that the defendant in error’s motion for rehearing be overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co., 67 S.W.2d 1112 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1934).
67 S.W.2d 1112 (Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co.
65 S.W.2d 496 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1933)