Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co.

67 S.W.2d 1112

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 7, 1934

DocketMotion No. 11111; No. 1693—6307

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.W.2d 1112 (Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co., 67 S.W.2d 1112 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

On motion for rehearing.

SHARP, Judge.

In our original opinion [65 S.W.(2d) 496]‘we erroneously stated that this suit was filed October 25, 1929. The record discloses that the suit was filed on March 21, 1930. While this correction in no- way changes the conclusions reached in the former opinion, it is made so that the facts stated will accurately state the facts contained in the record.

Having made the foregoing correction, we recommend that the defendant in error’s motion for rehearing be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On motion for rehearing.

SHARP, Judge.

In our original opinion [65 S.W.(2d) 496]‘we erroneously stated that this suit was filed October 25, 1929. The record discloses that the suit was filed on March 21, 1930. While this correction in no- way changes the conclusions reached in the former opinion, it is made so that the facts stated will accurately state the facts contained in the record.

Having made the foregoing correction, we recommend that the defendant in error’s motion for rehearing be overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.W.2d 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houk-v-kirby-petroleum-co-texcommnapp-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack