Houghton v. Strong

1 Cai. Cas. 486, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 302
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1803
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 486 (Houghton v. Strong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Houghton v. Strong, 1 Cai. Cas. 486, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 302 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The declaration is bad. It ought to have ftated, not only the injury, but how it arofe. If this be neceffary in this court, it is more fo before inferior tribunals, whefe proceedings may be reviewed here. Unlefs the cauffe of action be ftated with certainty, it is impoffible for us to know whether the juftice had jurifdidtion or not. This very fuit may, for aught that appears, have been in flander, or for an afiault and battery, or for fome other matter not cognizable before a juftice. Nor does it appear by any part of t-he record (none of the teftimony being returned) what kind of adtion was proved by the witneffes. The judgment muft, therefore, be reverfed as ith cofts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 486, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houghton-v-strong-nysupct-1803.