Houghton v. Page
1 N.H. 60
Opinion
The court now said, that the rule that a party who has put his name to a negotiable instrument cannot be a witness to shew it was originally void, even in a suit between the [61]*61original parties to the instrument, was too well settled to be questioned. 3 Mass. Rep. 27, Warren vs. Merry. — 4 do. 156, Churchill vs. Suter. — 10 do. 502, Manning vs. Wheatland. — 2 Johnson 165, Colman vs. Wise.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Houghton v. Page, 1 N.H. 60 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1817).
1 N.H. 60 (Houghton v. Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haines v. Dennett
11 N.H. 180 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1840)
Odiorne v. Howard
10 N.H. 343 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1839)
Marston v. Brackett
9 N.H. 336 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1838)
Ross v. Knight
4 N.H. 236 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1827)