Houghton v. Page

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Houghton v. Page

1 N.H. 60

CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire

DecidedMay 15, 1817

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 N.H. 60 (Houghton v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houghton v. Page, 1 N.H. 60 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

The court now said, that the rule that a party who has put his name to a negotiable instrument cannot be a witness to shew it was originally void, even in a suit between the [61]*61original parties to the instrument, was too well settled to be questioned. 3 Mass. Rep. 27, Warren vs. Merry. — 4 do. 156, Churchill vs. Suter. — 10 do. 502, Manning vs. Wheatland. — 2 Johnson 165, Colman vs. Wise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court now said, that the rule that a party who has put his name to a negotiable instrument cannot be a witness to shew it was originally void, even in a suit between the [61]*61original parties to the instrument, was too well settled to be questioned. 3 Mass. Rep. 27, Warren vs. Merry. — 4 do. 156, Churchill vs. Suter. — 10 do. 502, Manning vs. Wheatland. — 2 Johnson 165, Colman vs. Wise.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.H. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houghton-v-page-nhsuperct-1817.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack