Houghton v. Gardner

New York Supreme Court

Houghton v. Gardner

2 How. Pr. 144

DecidedApril 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 144 (Houghton v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houghton v. Gardner, 2 How. Pr. 144 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Beardsley, Justice.

Held that the plaintiffs were entitled to the balance of the costs, and that they might elect which way they would collect them, either to make up a new record and include the costs in it, or take a precept. Plaintiffs’ counsel elected to take a precept, and the rule was entered that the defendants pay $53.10, with $10 costs of this motion, in twenty-days after service of the order, or that a precept issue therefor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beardsley, Justice.

Held that the plaintiffs were entitled to the balance of the costs, and that they might elect which way they would collect them, either to make up a new record and include the costs in it, or take a precept. Plaintiffs’ counsel elected to take a precept, and the rule was entered that the defendants pay $53.10, with $10 costs of this motion, in twenty-days after service of the order, or that a precept issue therefor.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 How. Pr. 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houghton-v-gardner-nysupct-1846.