Houghton v. Brungardt
This text of 89 S.W.2d 440 (Houghton v. Brungardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an application for an injunction against appellees seeking to restrain them from interfering with the operation erf what 'are commonly called “marble machines” by appellant.
The trial court sustained the general demurrers filed by appellees and this appeal has been prosecuted from such action.
Neither party has filed briefs and we are therefore in the dark as to what the contentions of the parties were in the trial court.
After a careful study of appellant’s petition, we are of the opinion that it fails to negative every hypothesis on which the threatened acts of appellees might be lawful and, consequently, the demurrers were properly sustained.
The. judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.W.2d 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houghton-v-brungardt-texapp-1936.