Houghtaling v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.
25 N.Y.S. 1045, 80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 615, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 117, 73 Hun 615
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the case of Bryce v. Same Defendant, 25 N. Y. Supp. 1043, (decided herewith,) the judgment should be affirmed, with costs, and with leave to withdraw the demurrer, and answer, on payment of the costs and disbursements of the appeal, and costs in the court below. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Houghtaling v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co., 25 N.Y.S. 1045, 80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 615, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 117, 73 Hun 615 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
25 N.Y.S. 1045 (Houghtaling v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bryce v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.
25 N.Y.S. 1043 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)