Houghtaling v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.
25 N.Y.S. 1045, 80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 615, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 117, 73 Hun 615
This text of 25 N.Y.S. 1045 (Houghtaling v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Houghtaling v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co., 25 N.Y.S. 1045, 80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 615, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 117, 73 Hun 615 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the case of Bryce v. Same Defendant, 25 N. Y. Supp. 1043, (decided herewith,) the judgment should be affirmed, with costs, and with leave to withdraw the demurrer, and answer, on payment of the costs and disbursements of the appeal, and costs in the court below. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bryce v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.
25 N.Y.S. 1043 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 N.Y.S. 1045, 80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 615, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 117, 73 Hun 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houghtaling-v-louisville-new-albany-chicago-railway-co-nysupct-1893.