Hough v. Village of Clayton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Hough v. Village of Clayton

127 Ill. App. 294, 1906 Ill. App. LEXIS 372

DecidedMarch 20, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 127 Ill. App. 294 (Hough v. Village of Clayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hough v. Village of Clayton, 127 Ill. App. 294, 1906 Ill. App. LEXIS 372 (Ill. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Ramsay

delivered the opinion of the court.

The correctness of the abstract in this case has been challenged by appellee, and our attention called to the fact that the bill of exceptions does not show that any exception was made or saved to the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new' trial; nor to the rendering of the judgment.

The record sustains the claim so made by appellee and shows that appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, but no exception saved thereto. Judgment was rendered upon the verdict, but no exception saved by appellant.

The matters argued are, therefore, not before this court for review.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI