Hough v. Stover
2 Cai. Cas. 221
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 221 (Hough v. Stover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hough v. Stover, 2 Cai. Cas. 221 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).
Opinion
IT was ruled in this cafe at the laft term, that an application in arreft of judgment, was a non-enumerated motion, , , , . . - . - , - , - and that the notice need not ipecily the realons - became, as they are on the face of the record, they mult necellarily appear to the adverfe party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cai. Cas. 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hough-v-stover-nysupct-1804.