Hough v. Hale

Fourth Circuit

Hough v. Hale

305 F. App'x 108

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 29, 2008

DocketNo. 08-8061

StatusPublished

This text of 305 F. App'x 108 (Hough v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hough v. Hale, 305 F. App'x 108 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Glenn Hough appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hough v. Hale, No. 2:08-cv-00389-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 9 & entered Sept. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Glenn Hough appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hough v. Hale, No. 2:08-cv-00389-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 9 & entered Sept. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 F. App'x 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hough-v-hale-ca4-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack