Hough v. City of New York

116 N.Y.S. 658

This text of 116 N.Y.S. 658 (Hough v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hough v. City of New York, 116 N.Y.S. 658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued to recover for injuries occasioned by falling into a hole in a sidewalk. The jury gave'her a verdict for $300. The city appeals.

Without passing upon certain of plaintiff’s testimony, which was quite effectively overcome by the defendant, or upon the amount qf damages awarded, this judgment must be reversed. The dimensions of the hole were about two by three feet at its edges and sloping to a depth of about two inches. On the record here the city is entitled to the application of the. rule laid down in Hamilton v. City of Buffalo, 173 N. Y. 72, 65 N. E. 944, and Gastel v. City of New York, 194 N. Y. 15, 86 N. E. 833.

Judgment reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs to appellant in this court and in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gastel v. . City of New York
86 N.E. 833 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
Hamilton v. . City of Buffalo
65 N.E. 944 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 N.Y.S. 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hough-v-city-of-new-york-nyappterm-1909.