Houdini Properties Llc v. City of Romulus

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Houdini Properties Llc v. City of Romulus. Read the opinion of the Court — 480 Mich. 1022
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided August 27, 2007·No. 132018·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

August 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 132018 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. HOUDINI PROPERTIES, LLC, Stephen J. Markman, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 132018 v COA: 266338 Wayne CC: 05-504139-CZ CITY OF ROMULUS, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellee for extension of time for filing its supplemental brief and the response thereto in which plaintiff-appellant requests a similar extension are considered and, it appearing that both briefs were filed August 10, 2007, the time for filing for both parties is extended to that date.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. August 27, 2007 _________________________________________ Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Houdini Properties Llc v. City of Romulus, (Mich. 2007).

Houdini Properties Llc v. City of Romulus (Houdini Properties Llc v. City of Romulus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.