Houde v. Starkweather

143 A.D.2d 504, 533 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10707

This text of 143 A.D.2d 504 (Houde v. Starkweather) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Houde v. Starkweather, 143 A.D.2d 504, 533 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Motions to dismiss appeal denied and orders unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In affirming the orders, we note that the Board of Elections invalidated 162 signatures on petitioner’s designating petition allegedly due to incomplete addresses of the subscribing witnesses. Upon our review of the record, we find that this was error. The witnesses supplied all the information mandated by Election Law § 6-132 and these signatures should be restored. This new finding of fact, however, does not change the result. (Appeal from orders of Supreme Court, Monroe County, DePasquale, J. — Election Law.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 29, 1988.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 6-132
New York ELN § 6-132

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 A.D.2d 504, 533 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houde-v-starkweather-nyappdiv-1988.