Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Houck v. State

Houck v. State

704 So. 2d 605, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11570, 1997 WL 634168
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 1997
DocketNo. 97-993
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 704 So. 2d 605 (Houck v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Houck v. State, 704 So. 2d 605, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11570, 1997 WL 634168 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied the appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, referring inter alia to the trial court record. However, the pertinent portions of the trial court record were not attached to the order of denial as required by rule 3.850(d). We, therefore, reverse the order denying the motion and remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment of that portion of the files and records of the trial court that conclusively shows that the appellant is entitled to no relief. Cooper v. State, 700 So.2d 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

BARFIELD, C.J., and DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houck v. State
740 So. 2d 1252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Schultz v. Tampa Elec. Co.
704 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 So. 2d 605, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11570, 1997 WL 634168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houck-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.