Home/Second Circuit/Houbigant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Houbigant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

80 F.2d 1012
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 1936
Docket102
StatusPublished

This text of 80 F.2d 1012 (Houbigant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Houbigant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 80 F.2d 1012 (2d Cir. 1936).

Opinion

80 F.2d 1012 (1936)

HOUBIGANT, Incorporated, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 102.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 17, 1936.

Allen G. Gartner, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch and Maurice J. Mahoney, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Murray, Hollaman & Lockwood, of New York City (R. D. Murray and Edward H. Lockwood, both of New York City, of counsel), for Doshi Trading Co., Limited, amicus curiæ.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 F.2d 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houbigant-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca2-1936.