Home/Second Circuit/Houbigant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Houbigant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

80 F.2d 1012
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 17, 1936·No. 102·Published

Opinion

80 F.2d 1012 (1936)

HOUBIGANT, Incorporated, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 102.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 17, 1936.

Allen G. Gartner, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch and Maurice J. Mahoney, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Murray, Hollaman & Lockwood, of New York City (R. D. Murray and Edward H. Lockwood, both of New York City, of counsel), for Doshi Trading Co., Limited, amicus curiæ.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Houbigant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 80 F.2d 1012 (2d Cir. 1936).

80 F.2d 1012 (Houbigant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.