Hotz's Estate
38 Pa. 422, 1861 Pa. LEXIS 138
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered,
— All the requirements of this ease are so fully met and covered by the opinion of the learned President of the Orphans’ Court, that we are saved the labour of any additional investigation of the points raised, and affirm the decree for the reasons therein given; citing only, in addition to the authorities he has cited, the case of Connell et ux. v. Lovell’s Executors, 11 Casey 100. It fully sustains the doctrine announced in this ease.
Decree affirmed at the costs of the appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hotz's Estate, 38 Pa. 422, 1861 Pa. LEXIS 138 (Pa. 1861).
38 Pa. 422 (Hotz's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shackleton v. Food Machinery And Chemical Corporation
279 F.2d 919 (Seventh Circuit, 1960)
Shackleton v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp.
279 F.2d 919 (Seventh Circuit, 1960)
Holbrook's Estate
62 A. 368 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Estate of Bruch
39 A. 813 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)