Hotto v. Macchiarola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hotto v. Macchiarola

87 A.D.2d 576, 450 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15835

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 576 (Hotto v. Macchiarola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hotto v. Macchiarola, 87 A.D.2d 576, 450 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the Board of Examiners of the New York City Board of Education to recalculate petitioner’s score on the examination for a junior high school physical education license, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated January 16, 1981, which denied his application and dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. On consideration of the record before us, petitioner has presented evidence that the board of examiners lacked a rational basis for its determination that certain of petitioner’s examination answers were not as good as or better than the board’s key answers (see Matter of Lee v Roche, 78 AD2d 288; Matter of Acosta v Lang, 13 NY2d 1079). A hearing is required to resolve the issues presented. Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the Board of Examiners of the New York City Board of Education to recalculate petitioner’s score on the examination for a junior high school physical education license, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated January 16, 1981, which denied his application and dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. On consideration of the record before us, petitioner has presented evidence that the board of examiners lacked a rational basis for its determination that certain of petitioner’s examination answers were not as good as or better than the board’s key answers (see Matter of Lee v Roche, 78 AD2d 288; Matter of Acosta v Lang, 13 NY2d 1079). A hearing is required to resolve the issues presented. Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 576, 450 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hotto-v-macchiarola-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack